Wearables

Qualcomm confirms Snapdragon will be used in some Android Wear smart watches

5

qualcomm-android-wear-smart-watch

We already knew Qualcomm was one of the “involved” partners in yesterday’s Android Wear announcement, which is a new Android-based platform by Google that will debut for smart watches. We didn’t know the extent of their involvement, though (after all, they do currently sell a smart watch of their own), nor were we sure if they’d be looking to bring the Snapdragon line of chipsets to these new devices.

Galaxy S25 Ultra deal

Thankfully they have cleared a bit of that up, with the chipset vendor stating their intentions to provide Snapdragon-based chipsets for some of these devices. Unfortunately we’re not sure which devices they’ll be powering (so far we know of the Moto 360 and the LG G Watch), nor do we know which exact chipsets will be used.

We imagine Qualcomm won’t be trying to stuff a 2.5GHz quad-core Snapdragon 801 into any of these things, but a Snapdragon 200 or 400-based chipset could be in order. Nothing’s certain until details are made official, though, so we’ll just have to wait until more details about yesterday’s announcements begin trickling out.

[via Qualcomm]

Quentyn Kennemer
The "Google Phone" sounded too awesome to pass up, so I bought a G1. The rest is history. And yes, I know my name isn't Wilson.

Skype 4.7 update promises to loosen death grip on your battery

Previous article

Download the Metal Gear Solid 5: Ground Zeroes app for Android

Next article

You may also like

5 Comments

  1. A very low power Snapdragon needed

  2. I think smartwatches need special chipsets that are low cost low power w/o things like LTE or 720p, There must be new lines of chips

  3. definitely dont need a wrist warmer.

    1. Mean operating temperature: 45° C. Because f%&k the Imperial System.

  4. A Snapdragon 800 wouldn’t be a horrible idea because then you get the low-power language core and always listening, which would be great on a smartwatch. The Snappy 800 is actually REALLY power efficient at idle, which is what the watch will be most of the time, anyway (unless you’re glancing at it constantly).

    Probably a better idea would be for Qualcomm to manufacturer a lower clocked (maybe even make it dual-core instead of quad-core) and voltage and cost version of the Snapdragon 800 (but keep the low-power language core), and call it a “Snapdragon 700” or something. Best of both worlds.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Wearables